[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: test coverage

From: Joe Neeman
Subject: Re: test coverage
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 23:15:48 +0200

On 1/26/07, Han-Wen Nienhuys <address@hidden> wrote:
Joe Neeman escreveu:
> I have all the page-breaking files with coverage around 90% now, but
> I'll try to improve it a bit more (btw, the reason
> was so low is that I forgot to put a \book
> around the regression tests so the lilypond-book output skipped the
> page-breaking stuff. Oops).

We have Scheme coverage now as well.  This shows that

(define (walk-paths done-lines best-paths current-lines last current-best

isn't covered.  Can you also add a test that runs this old code?  Or should
we scrap it?
How about if we keep it for one more stable release? I can add a short test.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]