[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: New notehead (accent)
From: |
Maximilian Albert |
Subject: |
Re: New notehead (accent) |
Date: |
Tue, 03 Apr 2007 14:55:23 +0200 |
User-agent: |
IceDove 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070307) |
Werner LEMBERG schrieb:
> Everything looks very nice! However, I suggest that the inner side of
> the right part of the glyph is drawn a bit slimmer, similar to the `>'
> `sforzato' glyph, which has an optical correction to avoid excessive
> `smearing'.
Thanks for the hint, I hadn't noticed this correction in the sforzato
glyph, and most of the time I was looking at magnified versions of the
glyphs where the effect of smearing is much less obvious, if at all visible.
I attached two corrected pdf versions. In the first one the correction
is rather small. I like it a bit better, but I'm again judging from the
magnified view. In print the second version may prove more appealing.
I would appreciate your input if this is what you had in mind or if you
have any further suggestions for enhancement. I will then provide the
corresponding patch.
Thanks,
Max
accent_corrected1.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
accent_corrected2.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
- New notehead (accent), Maximilian Albert, 2007/04/02
- Re: New notehead (accent), Werner LEMBERG, 2007/04/03
- Re: New notehead (accent),
Maximilian Albert <=
- Re: New notehead (accent), Maximilian Albert, 2007/04/03
- Re: New notehead (accent), Werner LEMBERG, 2007/04/03
- Re: New notehead (accent), Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2007/04/03
- Re: New notehead (accent), Werner LEMBERG, 2007/04/04
- Re: New notehead (accent), Maximilian Albert, 2007/04/04
- Re: New notehead (accent), Maximilian Albert, 2007/04/10
- Re: New notehead (accent), Werner LEMBERG, 2007/04/10
- Re: New notehead (accent), Werner LEMBERG, 2007/04/10
- Re: New notehead (accent), Maximilian Albert, 2007/04/11