[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: GDP: rearrange manual

From: Graham Percival
Subject: Re: GDP: rearrange manual
Date: Sun, 09 Sep 2007 14:49:23 -0700
User-agent: Icedove (X11/20070607)

Mats Bengtsson wrote:
Just one general comment for the moment: I'd rather propose longer than
shorter subsections. I think that there already is too much fragmentation
at some places for the moment, which means that you never get the chance
to see the full picture as a reader.
Interesting suggestion; I was obviously thinking opposite to this -- for example, consider splitting Dynamics into (absolute) and (crescendi).

My motivation is that some people clearly hadn't read the whole doc subsection, and that having shorter subsections would make people more likely to read the whole thing.

Any other comments about this? I'm not convinced either way, but this is something we should definitely decide before getting into more details about a rearrangement.

- Graham

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]