[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: GDP: rearrangement (third attempt)

From: Mats Bengtsson
Subject: Re: GDP: rearrangement (third attempt)
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 14:37:31 +0200
User-agent: Thunderbird (X11/20070716)

Graham Percival wrote:

               + 6.6.2 Stems

Currently, this subsection has nothing to do with polyphony.
Furthermore it is layout specific, and should therefore be postponed.

I have _always_ hated this section. I remember trying -- and failing -- to find a home for it when I did my very first doc rearrangement, and it's still a pain.

Help? Anybody have a suggestion for where to move this to? (or perhaps delete entirely, and put info about \stemDown... where?)
How about some combined subsection on (ordinary) notes which deals with both note heads and stems? Currently, we don't have any specific subsection on note heads (though there are a few related to special notation). Any section that
describes \xxxDown and \xxxUp macros should also refer to the section
that describes \voiceOne and \voiceTwo, since that's mostly a better solution. (Sorry, couldn't help leaving the structure and talking about content for a moment).


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]