[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Accidental restore bug

From: Valentin Villenave
Subject: Re: Accidental restore bug
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 19:40:37 +0100

2007/9/17, Rune Zedeler <address@hidden>:

> The function cannot return 2.

> What accidental to typeset in front of the cis?
> (x)O   | (n#)O   |

> xO     | #O      |

> When I wrote the accidental code back in 2001 my intention was, that the
> only sensible thing to do in this case would be to output
> xO     | (n)#O     |

As a simple user, I have to say I fully agree with you.
(n#)O is simply unacceptable, and
#O can be confusing (it is sometimes used though -- but each time I
see it in a score I'm just puzzled). Besides, what good would be the
'cautionary style if no cautionary accidental is printed in such a


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]