[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: accidental changes: review

From: Han-Wen Nienhuys
Subject: Re: accidental changes: review
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 14:38:49 -0300

2007/9/26, Juergen Reuter <address@hidden>:

> I am just curious: Why not introducing a new class "Octaveless_pitch"
> or "Octave_Pitch" (i.e. pitch within an octave) that contains all of
> "Pitch" except for the octaves, and then making "Pitch" a subclass of
> "Octaveless_pitch" that just adds the octaves to its superclass?

There would only be one scheme type, the one for the base class, so
this will require some extra typechecking for the Scheme interfaces

Han-Wen Nienhuys - address@hidden -

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]