Re: GPD: official shortest note in lilypond

[Graham Percival]

Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> I think it would be better to phrase it as:
>
> There is no fundamental limit to note durations (both in terms of
> longest and shortest), but the number of glyphs is limited: there are
> flags up 64th and rests up to 128th. At the other extreme, there are
> note heads up to longa (4x whole note) and rests up to maxima (8 x
> whole?).  Since beams can be extended arbitrarily, beamed notes can be
> arbitrarily short.

Ok.  I'm not certain that people care about the difference between
glyphs and "program limitations", but this is in a @refbugs, so it's
already on a more technical level.

I think this discussion is over.

Cheers,
- Graham