[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [patch] first-clef property
From: |
Han-Wen Nienhuys |
Subject: |
Re: [patch] first-clef property |
Date: |
Wed, 6 Feb 2008 23:49:49 -0200 |
2008/2/2, Juergen Reuter <address@hidden>:
> However, I see a very important feature missing in this approach:
> An incipit should (at least in my view) be thought of as the beginning of
> a piece written in notation that comes close to the autograph or first
> publishing. That is, the incipit actually starts the music. Then, at
> some point (e.g. after the clef or after the first note of each voice or
> after the first few notes), the music is reset to its start, the notation
> switches to modern style, and printing starts again, this time from the
> very beginning to the very end.
Hi,
I concur with Juergen here. Since the incipit is a completely
different piece of notation (eg. whose spacing and beat counting
should not influence the main music), this should be implemented
similiar to the hack with a \score inside the instrument name.
I think the best approach is to figure out what the problems with that
approach are, and try to solve those.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - address@hidden - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
- Re: Incipits, (continued)
- Re: Incipits, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2008/02/10
- Re: Incipits, Karl Hammar, 2008/02/11
- Re: Incipits, Juergen Reuter, 2008/02/11
- Re: Incipits, Robert Memering, 2008/02/11
- Re: Incipits, Till Rettig, 2008/02/11
- Re: Incipits, Juergen Reuter, 2008/02/11
- Re: Incipits, Till Rettig, 2008/02/11
- Re: Incipits, Karl Hammar, 2008/02/11
- Re: Incipits, Nicolas Sceaux, 2008/02/11
- Re: Incipits, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2008/02/11
- Re: [patch] first-clef property,
Han-Wen Nienhuys <=
- Re: [patch] first-clef property, Nicolas Sceaux, 2008/02/07
- Re: [patch] first-clef property, Till Rettig, 2008/02/07
Re: [patch] first-clef property, Reinhold Kainhofer, 2008/02/02