[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Build failure with Scheme (again)
From: |
Valentin Villenave |
Subject: |
Re: Build failure with Scheme (again) |
Date: |
Sat, 26 Apr 2008 13:39:31 +0200 |
2008/4/26 Nicolas Sceaux <address@hidden>:
> No, they do work as TextScript or RehearsalMark, but you have to
> adapt line-width.
Right! They do work as TextScripts attached to a note, but as
RehearsalMarks they can go out of the page (or when they're attached
to MultiMeasureRests, see issue 609); we can keep them with the other
alignment commands but I'll have to put some @knownbugs, @warnings or
whatever to document it.
Of course, you'll agree to say that a markup that can go out of the
page (even in spite of keep-inside-line) is not a markup that does
fully work... That was what I meant.
Cheers,
Valentin
- Re: Build failure with Scheme (again), (continued)
- Re: Build failure with Scheme (again), Valentin Villenave, 2008/04/22
- Re: Build failure with Scheme (again), Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2008/04/22
- Re: Build failure with Scheme (again), Mats Bengtsson, 2008/04/25
- Re: Build failure with Scheme (again), Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2008/04/25
- Re: Build failure with Scheme (again), Nicolas Sceaux, 2008/04/26
- Re: Build failure with Scheme (again), Nicolas Sceaux, 2008/04/26
- Re: Build failure with Scheme (again), Graham Percival, 2008/04/26
- Re: Build failure with Scheme (again), Nicolas Sceaux, 2008/04/26
- Re: Build failure with Scheme (again), Valentin Villenave, 2008/04/26
- Re: Build failure with Scheme (again), Nicolas Sceaux, 2008/04/26
- Re: Build failure with Scheme (again),
Valentin Villenave <=
- Re: Build failure with Scheme (again), Graham Percival, 2008/04/26
- RE: Build failure with Scheme (again), Carl D. Sorensen, 2008/04/26