Re: GDP: 2.3.2.1 Harp

[Graham Percival]

On Mon, 12 May 2008 12:23:01 +0100
"Trevor Daniels" <address@hidden> wrote:

> > At the risk of being as cheeky with you as I am with Valentin,
> 
> You wouldn't dare!

Given that I just *did*, I clearly /would/ dare.  :)

> > what about NR 1.1.4 Shape note heads?  ;)
> 
> This certainly covers sacred harp and other shape heads (although
> now I've looked at it the example could be improved to show at
> least a seven-tone scale, the better to illustrate the difference
> between Aiken and Sacred Harp notation.)

I have no objection; go ahead.  I'd rather that it all fit onto
one line, though.

Cheers,
- Graham