[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Fwd: [PATCH] Re: Octavation syntax consistency
|
From: |
Neil Puttock |
|
Subject: |
Re: Fwd: [PATCH] Re: Octavation syntax consistency |
|
Date: |
Sun, 27 Jul 2008 20:14:44 +0100 |
2008/7/27 John Mandereau <address@hidden>:
> \ottava produces *ottava brackets* in the output, so this perfectly
> makes sense, and \ottava is shorter to type, isn't it Valentin ;-) ?
I also favour \ottava.
Regards,
Neil
- Re: Fwd: [PATCH] Re: Octavation syntax consistency, (continued)
- Re: Fwd: [PATCH] Re: Octavation syntax consistency, Paul Scott, 2008/07/24
- Re: Fwd: [PATCH] Re: Octavation syntax consistency, Reinhold Kainhofer, 2008/07/24
- Re: Fwd: [PATCH] Re: Octavation syntax consistency, Graham Percival, 2008/07/24
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Octavation syntax consistency, Werner LEMBERG, 2008/07/24
- Re: Fwd: [PATCH] Re: Octavation syntax consistency, Reinhold Kainhofer, 2008/07/27
- Re: Fwd: [PATCH] Re: Octavation syntax consistency, Valentin Villenave, 2008/07/27
- Re: Fwd: [PATCH] Re: Octavation syntax consistency, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2008/07/27
- Re: Fwd: [PATCH] Re: Octavation syntax consistency, Graham Percival, 2008/07/27
- Re: Fwd: [PATCH] Re: Octavation syntax consistency, Trevor Daniels, 2008/07/28
Re: Fwd: [PATCH] Re: Octavation syntax consistency, John Mandereau, 2008/07/27
- Re: Fwd: [PATCH] Re: Octavation syntax consistency,
Neil Puttock <=
Re: Fwd: [PATCH] Re: Octavation syntax consistency, Paul Scott, 2008/07/25