[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: any remaining syntax changes?
From: |
Carl Sorensen |
Subject: |
Re: any remaining syntax changes? |
Date: |
Wed, 13 Aug 2008 19:27:45 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) |
Neil Puttock <n.puttock <at> gmail.com> writes:
>
> 2008/8/13 Graham Percival <gpermus <at> gmail.com>:
> > I'm a bit concerned that we still have changing syntax (the
> > current docs can't be compiled with 2.11.55, for example) so close
> > to 2.12. I'd really like .56 to have the completed syntax, so we
> > could have at least one or two devel releases before 2.12 with an
> > unchanging syntax.
>
> I'm not aware of any syntax changes between 2.11-55-1 and 55-2; it
> must be Carl's predefined fretboards which are causing compilation to
> fail.
This makes sense to me -- there's lots of code in the GDP docs that use
the predefined fretboard stuff. I'll be happy to freeze that syntax now,
and postpone any future changes until after 2.12.
Carl