[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: shorthand for autoBeam control

From: Mats Bengtsson
Subject: Re: shorthand for autoBeam control
Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2008 10:38:09 +0200
User-agent: Thunderbird (X11/20070716)

We already have the predefined macro \noBeam. Do we really need yet another
more or less obscure special case of the syntax?


Werner LEMBERG wrote:
I'm not sure whether this has been discussed before: What do you think
of using `c[]' as a shorthand for `\autoBeamOff c \autoBeamOn'?

Currently, `c[]' produces


(a note with a beamlet to the left and right), which is neither
documented nor makes much sense IMHO.

My special example is this where such a shorthand would be quite

  c4 c c \times 2/3 { r8 c16 } c8

(see attached image).



lilypond-devel mailing list

        Mats Bengtsson
        Signal Processing
        School of Electrical Engineering
        Royal Institute of Technology (KTH)
        SE-100 44  STOCKHOLM
        Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463                         
       Fax:   (+46) 8 790 7260
        Email: address@hidden

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]