[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Status of manuals
From: |
Patrick McCarty |
Subject: |
Re: Status of manuals |
Date: |
Fri, 12 Sep 2008 13:34:50 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 02:02:21PM -0600, Andrew Hawryluk wrote:
> I'd be up for some reviewing. I'm still new enough at LilyPond that
> I'd learn a lot from some 'assigned readings' and I could probably
> tell if they make sense to someone that doesn't compile their own
> LilyPond binaries over breakfast.
This literally made me laugh, since I think this description applies
to me. :-) Thanks, Andrew.
If you would like to review NR 1.6, that would be great. I am done
with the main docs in this section now (in git), but not the snippets
sections, so just ignore those for now. Once Reinhold rebuilds the
docs on his site, my latest changes will show up.
Thanks,
Patrick
- Re: Status of manuals, (continued)
- Re: Status of manuals, Trevor Daniels, 2008/09/12
- Re: Status of manuals, Andrew Hawryluk, 2008/09/12
- Re: Status of manuals, Trevor Daniels, 2008/09/12
- Re: Status of manuals, Andrew Hawryluk, 2008/09/12
- Re: Status of manuals, Trevor Daniels, 2008/09/12
- Re: Status of manuals, Carl D. Sorensen, 2008/09/12
- Re: Status of manuals, Reinhold Kainhofer, 2008/09/12
- Re: Status of manuals, Patrick McCarty, 2008/09/12
- Re: Status of manuals, Reinhold Kainhofer, 2008/09/12
- Re: Status of manuals, Trevor Daniels, 2008/09/12
- Re: Status of manuals,
Patrick McCarty <=
- Re: Status of manuals, Andrew Hawryluk, 2008/09/12
Re: Status of manuals, Trevor Daniels, 2008/09/12