[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: NR 1.5 and 1.6 reviewed

From: Trevor Daniels
Subject: Re: NR 1.5 and 1.6 reviewed
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 12:03:21 +0100

Patrick McCarty wrote Thursday, October 02, 2008 8:41 AM
Subject: Re: NR 1.5 and 1.6 reviewed

On Thu, Oct 02, 2008 at 09:14:25AM +0200, Valentin Villenave wrote:
2008/10/2 Andrew Hawryluk <address@hidden>:
> In the third musical example under "Instrument names" (.itely lines
> 963–977), why is "Flute" not centered above "Clarinetti / in B(flat)"?

lilypond-book uses a custom paper block, and this upsets the default
formatting of this example.  Perhaps I should add a note about this?

No. This is one occasion where changing the layout block is
justified.  By default the indent is set to the paper-width divided by
14, which for A4 gives an indent of 1.5\cm.  To show the default
behaviour use
for this example.

However, this is still not quite enough to centre "Flute" due to the
length of the second instrument name.  Perhaps both instrument
names should be shorter to illustrate the default behaviour properly.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]