[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

NR 1.5 and 1.6 reviewed

From: Andrew Hawryluk
Subject: NR 1.5 and 1.6 reviewed
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 22:05:45 -0600

After much delay, I finished reviewing the text of NR 1.5 and 1.6
(attached). Overall, it was very informative and well written. Here I
only mention those changes that warrant discussion, or questions I

NR 1.5 (simultaneous):

Developers (Mats?) can you see if I covered all the known issues with

Valentin (or anyone with similar LSR authority), can you edit the
snippet ? Please change "measure
units" to "units of measure".

NR 1.6 (staff):

I changed the unnumberedsubsubsec "Deeper nested staff groups" to
"Nested staff groups" because there is no previous nesting to be
deeper than. (That was an ugly sentence.) However, if changing the
document outline was outside the scope of my assignment you may revert
the change.

In the third musical example under "Instrument names" (.itely lines
963–977), why is "Flute" not centered above "Clarinetti / in B(flat)"?

line 1037: what is an alist? should it be @code{alist}? does it
require more explanation?

In the cue note examples the sixteenth-note beams are too wide - they
almost merge into a single beam. Is this a bug?

General (entire NR):

The text of the PDF is not actually black - I suspect it's a CMYK to
RGB conversion issue, but on my screen (Adobe Reader on Ubuntu) it
renders as grey #221e1f. This means that the printed text is a dark
grey halftone that gives the letterforms rough edges and makes them
harder to read.

As usual, feel free to accept or revert any edits I made.

Attachment: Documentation_user_simultaneous.itely
Description: Binary data

Attachment: Documentation_user_staff.itely
Description: Binary data

Attachment: cue-beams.png
Description: PNG image

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]