[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Suggestion: tempo ranges

From: John Zaitseff
Subject: Re: Suggestion: tempo ranges
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 14:58:42 +1100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)

Dear Han-Wen,

> John Zaitseff wrote:
> > > I´m not saying it´s too difficult; I´m saying I won´t apply
> > > your patch :-)
> >
> > Not trying to be difficult, but given that this idea (of tempo
> > ranges) seems to me to be a reasonable one, is there any reason
> > why not?  I realise that it is a syntax change; is that reason
> > enough?

> I think it is a feature that will only benefit few users, and does
> not warrant an extension of the parser.  Changing the syntax is
> problematic because it may in the future prevent us from doing
> other changes.

Well, that's fair enough.

> What is the problem with using a music function?

Nothing really, except that it would have been nice to have the
syntactic sugar of "\tempo 4. = 92-96" as I suggested.

Yours truly,

John Zaitseff

John Zaitseff                    ,--_|\    The ZAP Group
Phone:  +61 2 9643 7737         /      \   Sydney, Australia
E-mail: address@hidden   \_,--._*

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]