Re: NR 2.8 Ancient music ready for review

[Trevor Daniels]

Eyolf

More comments on Ancient now seem unlikely.  There have not been many, but 
that's par for the course when editing manuals :(  Are you intending to 
complete the transformation of Ancient sometime soon?  If you could finish 
off all the music-related stuff I'd be happy (well, "willing" would be more 
accurate) to deal with any remaining formatting issues, although I'd be 
delighted if you could do these too.

Trevor

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Eyolf Østrem" <address@hidden>
To: "lily-devel" <address@hidden>
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2008 9:59 AM
Subject: NR 2.8 Ancient music ready for review


> The section on Ancient music is now ready for comments. It has been
> completely rewritten and reorganized, so please have a look at it and
> comment, correct, or criticize.
>
> Here's a "changelog":
>
> - The main change is that the general organization has been revised into
>  two main sections: Gregorian chant notation and Mensural music. There was
>  fairly little overlap between the alternative signs, which were mostly
>  ancient, and the additional, which mostly belonged to the Gregorian
>  section.
> - The two ligature tables in the Gregorian section have been merged into
>  one.
> - There are still a few TODOs left, as well as missing cross references
>  here and there, the odd example of bad formatting, etc. This is
>  particularly true about the last section, which has not yet been written.
>  I focused on the main text for this first round; there will be another
>  round for this kind of formalities later on.
>
> Eyolf
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel