James E. Bailey wrote Monday, March 23, 2009 2:15 PM
In any event, hopefully this is an acceptable patch. Whether or
not
introduction of single-staff polyphony should be kept at this
point
in the LM (since doing so does not follow Documentation policy)
is a
different conversation.
The good news is the patch works fine and the docs still
compile with it applied. So I've applied it and
pushed it to origin/master. I can't say I'm wild about it,
as it uses so many concepts which have not been introduced
at that point, so it will probably be moved when I get back
to working on the LM, but in an odd-numbered release I'm
prepared to accept it.
But, as I said before, I think that removing it altogether is
also a
bad idea. Perhaps a simple warning that the section introduces
several new concepts that haven't been fully explained with
links to
the appropriate sections that do explain them fully would be
enough.
Would you like to prepare another patch which does this?
That would be an improvement.