[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GUB on kainhofer: still cross/gcc
From: |
Jan Nieuwenhuizen |
Subject: |
Re: GUB on kainhofer: still cross/gcc |
Date: |
Tue, 02 Jun 2009 16:30:36 +0200 |
Op dinsdag 02-06-2009 om 07:02 uur [tijdzone -0700], schreef Graham
Percival:
> On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 12:28:29PM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> > Op dinsdag 02-06-2009 om 03:05 uur [tijdzone -0700], schreef Graham
> > Percival:
> >
> > > Anyway, with this patch, the darwin-x86::cross/gcc build
> > > succeedes:
> >
> > Great. I've just pushed this, with an extra if:
> >
> > if self.build_bits == '32' and self.build_hardware_bits == '64':
> >
> > to narrow down the change even more.
>
> Two problems:
> 1) this affects darwin-x86, not darwin-ppc. (at least, I haven't
> tested darwin-ppc, only darwin-x86).
Interesting. I missed that bit.
Your original report is about ppc, right?
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2009-03/msg00356.html
> AttributeError: 'Odcctools__darwin__x86' object has no attribute
> 'build_bits'
Ah, that should prolly be self.settings. I'll wait a bit until
x86/ppc is cleared up.
Jan.
--
>
> Jan Nieuwenhuizen <address@hidden> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
> AvatarĀ®: http://AvatarAcademy.nl | http://lilypond.org
- Re: GUB on kainhofer: still cross/gcc, Graham Percival, 2009/06/01
- Re: GUB on kainhofer: still cross/gcc, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2009/06/02
- Re: GUB on kainhofer: still cross/gcc, Graham Percival, 2009/06/02
- Re: GUB on kainhofer: still cross/gcc, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2009/06/02
- Re: GUB on kainhofer: still cross/gcc, Graham Percival, 2009/06/02
- Re: GUB on kainhofer: still cross/gcc,
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <=
- Re: GUB on kainhofer: still cross/gcc, Graham Percival, 2009/06/02
- Re: GUB on kainhofer: still cross/gcc, Graham Percival, 2009/06/03
- Re: GUB on kainhofer: still cross/gcc, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2009/06/03