[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lilypond 2.13.1 up
From: |
Patrick McCarty |
Subject: |
Re: lilypond 2.13.1 up |
Date: |
Wed, 3 Jun 2009 11:04:58 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 12:36:24PM -0500, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
> Patrick McCarty wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Francisco Vila <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> 2009/6/2 Han-Wen Nienhuys <address@hidden>:
>>>> Hi guys,
>>>>
>>>> I pushed a new lily release (actually that happened on sunday, but due
>>>> to the savannah problems, the website did not show it). It was made
>>>> with an updated GUB version (it now ships Ghostscript 8.65). Please
>>>> have a ride and tell me if there are problems. It did run
>>>> successfully under WINE.
>>> It does not include fixes to 739 and 759 from Friday.
>>>
>>> On Linux i386, ps file is generated but not converted to pdf.
>>>
>>> Log says
>>>
>>> Converting to `./test.pdf'...
>>> `gs -q -dSAFER -dDEVICEWIDTHPOINTS=595.28 -dDEVICEHEIGHTPOINTS=841.89
>>> -dCompatibilityLevel=1.4 -dNOPAUSE -dBATCH -r1200 -sDEVICE=pdfwrite
>>> -sOutputFile="./test.pdf" -c .setpdfwrite -f "test.ps"' failed (256)
>>
>> I can reproduce this here (with GNU/Linux 32-bit). Attached is the
>> output I get with `lilypond -V'.
>>
>> -Patrick
>>
>
> Is this problem related to the binary posted at lilypond.org? I have no
> problems with the 2.13.1 I build from source.
Yes, I was testing the GUB binary at lilypond.org.
I have just confirmed the problem on 64-bit GNU/Linux too.
The problem seems to be exactly what the error message reports: there
is no file gs_init.ps located in the installation directory.
My system Ghostscript has this file:
/usr/share/ghostscript/8.64/Resource/Init/gs_init.ps
> If it would help, I can test on Xubuntu 9.04, OSX 10.4, Windows XP and
> Windows 7.
Certainly! I'm sure not many people are testing on Windows 7 yet, so
this information would be helpful.
-Patrick
- Re: lilypond 2.13.1 up, (continued)
Re: lilypond 2.13.1 up, Francisco Vila, 2009/06/03
- Re: lilypond 2.13.1 up, Patrick McCarty, 2009/06/03
- Re: lilypond 2.13.1 up,
Patrick McCarty <=
- Re: lilypond 2.13.1 up, Jonathan Kulp, 2009/06/03
- Re: lilypond 2.13.1 up, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2009/06/03
- Re: lilypond 2.13.1 up, Paul Scott, 2009/06/04
- Re: lilypond 2.13.1 up, Paul Scott, 2009/06/04
- Re: lilypond 2.13.1 up, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2009/06/05
- Re: lilypond 2.13.1 up, Francisco Vila, 2009/06/05
- Re: lilypond 2.13.1 up, Jonathan Kulp, 2009/06/05
- Re: lilypond 2.13.1 up, Jonathan Kulp, 2009/06/05
- Re: lilypond 2.13.1 up, Francisco Vila, 2009/06/05
- Re: lilypond 2.13.1 up, Jonathan Kulp, 2009/06/05