[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: some sort of suppress-accidental?
From: |
Neil Puttock |
Subject: |
Re: some sort of suppress-accidental? |
Date: |
Tue, 16 Jun 2009 22:41:51 +0100 |
2009/6/16 Mark Polesky <address@hidden>:
> I wish there were a similar way to suppress the printing of the
> accidental from within the NoteEvent expression.
>
> Something like 'suppress-accidental that would fit right where
> 'force-accidental goes in the scheme expression. Is that
> possible? Would it be difficult to implement?
It's quite simple to do.
Attached is a patch which uses an ampersand to hide accidentals.
Regards,
Neil
0001-Allow-accidentals-to-be-hidden-using-ampersand.patch
Description: Text Data
- some sort of suppress-accidental?, Mark Polesky, 2009/06/15
- Re: some sort of suppress-accidental?, Jonathan Kulp, 2009/06/16
- Re: some sort of suppress-accidental?,
Neil Puttock <=
- Re: some sort of suppress-accidental?, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2009/06/16
- Re: some sort of suppress-accidental?, Werner LEMBERG, 2009/06/17
- Re: some sort of suppress-accidental?, Mark Polesky, 2009/06/18
- how about \accidental-once #note ? (Re: some sort of suppress-accidental?), Ted Walther, 2009/06/18
- Re: how about \accidental-once #note ? (Re: some sort of suppress-accidental?), Mark Polesky, 2009/06/18
- Re: how about \accidental-once #note ? (Re: some sort of suppress-accidental?), Ted Walther, 2009/06/18
- Re: some sort of suppress-accidental?, Ted Walther, 2009/06/18
- Re: some sort of suppress-accidental?, Graham Percival, 2009/06/18
- Re: some sort of suppress-accidental?, Ted Walther, 2009/06/18
- Re: some sort of suppress-accidental?, Werner LEMBERG, 2009/06/18