[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: improving cheatsheet appearance
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: improving cheatsheet appearance |
Date: |
Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:18:08 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
Thanks, applied. I ended up using
\hideNotes
c128
for the key signature example; it works, and that's simpler than
messing with the @lilypond[] options.
Cheers,
- Graham
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 11:25:36PM -0700, Mark Polesky wrote:
>
> In cheatsheet.itely
>
> I propose changing line 70 (in "time signature") from
> \override Staff.Clef #'transparent = ##t
> to
> \override Staff.Clef #'stencil = #empty-stencil
>
> Also, in "key signature" (lines 95-102),
> the auto-generated \paper block is
>
> \paper {
> #(define dump-extents #t)
>
> indent = 0\mm
> ragged-right = ##t
> force-assignment = #""
> line-width = #(- line-width (* mm 3.000000))
> }
> but looks better as
>
> \paper {
> #(define dump-extents #t)
>
> indent = 0\mm
> left-margin = 20\mm
> ragged-right = ##f
> force-assignment = #""
> line-width = 15\mm
> }
>
> But, of course, I read this in the CG:
> If you are making an
> example demonstrating special
> \paper{} values, contact the
> Documentation Editor.
>
> So, I'll leave it at that. If someone wants to make
> these changes, I think the cheatsheet will look
> nicer. I can patch a change for the first one, but
> I don't know how to touch the auto-generated \paper
> code for the second one.
>
> HTH
> - Mark
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel