Re: [PATCH] Make some local functions public (was: Re: lily-library.scm question)

[Mark Polesky]

Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> I mean to have an automated set of tests, that checks for example that
> 
> (eq? (split-at-predicate odd?   '(2 3 6 8 9 0))
>        '((2) (6 8) (0)))
> 
> holds.  It would be .ly file that runs Scheme function on a set of
> inputs, and compares them to a set of outputs to make sure that they
> match.

Oh, I see, kind of like regression tests for scheme functions? But
there are a *lot* of scheme functions in the source... any priorities?
I'm thinking lily-library.scm and c++.scm. What files/functions were
you thinking about? That might be within my means as a Little Schemer.

Happy to help.
- Mark