[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Time to retire Dynamic_engraver?

From: Carl D. Sorensen
Subject: Re: Time to retire Dynamic_engraver?
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 16:57:24 -0600

On 6/24/09 2:33 PM, "Neil Puttock" <address@hidden> wrote:

> 2009/6/24 Carl D. Sorensen <address@hidden>:
>> Shouldn't we do this by eliminating Dynamic_engraver and renaming
>> New_dynamic_engraver to Dynamic_engraver?
> I'm not sure, since New_dynamic_engraver doesn't have all the
> functionality of Dynamic_engraver (though it would be easy enough to
> have a convert rule which adds Dynamic_align_engraver if necessary.)

But if we're eliminating Dynamic_engraver, all the functionality it has will
be going away anyway.  So I don't think there's any loss in changing the


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]