[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Time to retire Dynamic_engraver?
From: |
Neil Puttock |
Subject: |
Re: Time to retire Dynamic_engraver? |
Date: |
Sun, 28 Jun 2009 17:25:54 +0100 |
2009/6/24 Carl D. Sorensen <address@hidden>:
> But if we're eliminating Dynamic_engraver, all the functionality it has will
> be going away anyway. So I don't think there's any loss in changing the
> name.
Fair enough; I guess I've just got used to the name New_dynamic_engraver. :)
Regards,
Neil
- Time to retire Dynamic_engraver?, Neil Puttock, 2009/06/23
- Re: Time to retire Dynamic_engraver?, Patrick McCarty, 2009/06/24
- Re: Time to retire Dynamic_engraver?, Neil Puttock, 2009/06/28
- Re: Time to retire Dynamic_engraver?, Mark Polesky, 2009/06/28
- Re: Time to retire Dynamic_engraver?, Neil Puttock, 2009/06/28
- Re: Time to retire Dynamic_engraver?, Mark Polesky, 2009/06/28
- Re: Time to retire Dynamic_engraver?, Neil Puttock, 2009/06/29
- type-check list in NR 6.1.1 (was: Time to retire Dynamic_engraver?), Mark Polesky, 2009/06/29
- Re: type-check list in NR 6.1.1 (was: Time to retire Dynamic_engraver?), Carl D. Sorensen, 2009/06/29
- Re: type-check list in NR 6.1.1 (was: Time to retire Dynamic_engraver?), Mark Polesky, 2009/06/29
- Re: type-check list in NR 6.1.1 (was: Time to retire Dynamic_engraver?), Carl D. Sorensen, 2009/06/29