[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: lilybuntu confusion

From: Graham Percival
Subject: Re: lilybuntu confusion
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 12:02:17 -0700
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)

On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 12:41:32PM -0500, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
> Graham Percival wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 10:50:07PM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote:
>> Does this still compile the lilypond examples?  That would take
>> take much longer than 10-30 seconds.
> I'm able to copy to different location and compile certain files by 
> themselves as long as they don't require a bunch of @include files.  They 
> compile very quickly this way.  I wonder if it might help to define some 
> new Make targets.  For example "make lilypond-learning.pdf" would only 
> compile the LM, and I would assume save quite a bit of time in compiling 
> over "make doc".

I was already planning on splitting the docs into
Documentation/learning, Documentation/notation, etc., so that
would implicitly do this anyway.  :)

- Graham

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]