[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Is this possibly a bug?

From: Mark Polesky
Subject: Re: Is this possibly a bug?
Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 08:30:35 -0700 (PDT)

David Kastrup wrote:

> Huh?  The behavior is unlike `dodecaphonic', but that does not make
> thesecond part right.
> "this rule never prints accidentals consistent with the key
> signature"or "this rule only ever prints accidentals deviating
> from/inconsistentwith the key signature".


You are correct. How about "this rule never prints accidentals that
[appear/are (already)] in the key signature"?

- Mark


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]