[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is this possibly a bug?
From: |
Mark Polesky |
Subject: |
Re: Is this possibly a bug? |
Date: |
Sat, 1 Aug 2009 08:30:35 -0700 (PDT) |
David Kastrup wrote:
> Huh? The behavior is unlike `dodecaphonic', but that does not make
> thesecond part right.
>
> "this rule never prints accidentals consistent with the key
> signature"or "this rule only ever prints accidentals deviating
> from/inconsistentwith the key signature".
David,
You are correct. How about "this rule never prints accidentals that
[appear/are (already)] in the key signature"?
- Mark