Re: new repos: do we want an archive?

[Han-Wen Nienhuys]

On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 5:19 AM, Graham Percival<address@hidden> wrote:
> GUB won't be moved into lilypond git, and web stuff will live in
> master and stable.  So currently we're only looking at creating
> one extra repo:
> address@hidden/lilypond/lilypad.git
>      description: Lightweight editor for lilypond files
>
> However, I started wondering about all the old history that would
> be lost when we delete web/ and (to a much lesser extent)
> web-gop/.  That also reminded me of dev/rune, which I find myself
> reluctant to delete.

>      description: Old material for lilypond

I don't understand this action.  In general the whole purpose of
having a source code control system is to _have_ an archive old
material.  Why do you want to delete old stuff, or move it into a
different repo where nobody will be able to find it?

-- 
Han-Wen Nienhuys - address@hidden - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen