lilypond-devel
[Top][All Lists]

## Re: alternatives not taken into account in automatic accidentals

 From: Dan Eble Subject: Re: alternatives not taken into account in automatic accidentals Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2009 18:28:48 -0400

On 9 Aug 2009, at 18:21, Mark Polesky wrote:


Dan Eble wrote:

I appreciate your reply.  Applying this statement to certain
other figures (e.g. key signature or clef) would indicate a bug.
Does a non-functional bar line differ from those?


I wouldn't apply that statement to other figures. This is a
specific behavior of the \bar command.



OK, but what I was trying to ask is, is it a *correct* behavior of the \bar command? Saying that something is so differs from saying that it should be so.


I'll try to look at this at some point.
- Mark


Thanks,
--
Dan