[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: the "r" in "git pull -r"
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: the "r" in "git pull -r" |
Date: |
Mon, 10 Aug 2009 00:56:10 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 04:48:45PM -0700, Graham Percival wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 11:45:05PM +0200, John Mandereau wrote:
> > Le samedi 08 août 2009 à 13:55 -0600, Carl Sorensen a écrit :
> > > As a practical matter, -r first applies the changes that were made on
> > > origin
> > > (since your branch was checked out), then applies your changes on top of
> > > the
> > > current origin. The prevents an extra commit to merge your branch with
> > > origin, and keeps the git history cleaner.
> > >
> > > My recommendation is to always use it; it makes things much nicer.
> >
> > I agree, except when docs in English are edited and translations
> > committishes are updated before edited docs in English are pushed.
>
> ? And even worse, the difference between those two commands
> depends on what kind of update the contributor is working on?!
After spending a while reading and re-reading your addition to the
CG git stuff, it sounds like this only applies to translated docs
-- i.e. as long as I don't mess with anything in de/ es/ fr/ etc/,
it's safe to "git pull -r".
Is that correct? If so, I'll amend the warning to begin
"translators: if you have changed committishes..."
Cheers,
- Graham
- Re: lilycontrib.tcl, was Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", (continued)
- Re: lilycontrib.tcl, was Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Maximilian Albert, 2009/08/12
- Re: lilycontrib.tcl, was Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Johannes Schindelin, 2009/08/11
- Re: lilycontrib.tcl, was Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Jonathan Kulp, 2009/08/11
- Re: lilycontrib.tcl, was Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Jonathan Kulp, 2009/08/11
- Re: lilycontrib.tcl, was Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Johannes Schindelin, 2009/08/11
- Re: lilycontrib.tcl, was Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Johannes Schindelin, 2009/08/11
- Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", John Mandereau, 2009/08/10
- Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Graham Percival, 2009/08/10
- Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Francisco Vila, 2009/08/10
- Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Trevor Daniels, 2009/08/10
- Re: the "r" in "git pull -r",
Graham Percival <=
- Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", John Mandereau, 2009/08/10
- Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", John Mandereau, 2009/08/10