[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Lilypond Syntax Development and 3.0
From: |
Reinhold Kainhofer |
Subject: |
Re: Lilypond Syntax Development and 3.0 |
Date: |
Sat, 22 Aug 2009 01:31:30 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.11.4 (Linux/2.6.29-02062906-generic; KDE/4.2.4; i686; ; ) |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Am Samstag, 1. August 2009 09:52:59 schrieb Trevor Daniels:
> > CRESCENDO
> >
> > Reinhold and Frederick: as you may have guessed, I'm proposing
> > that your patch waits until 3.0. Anything requiring such manual
> > tweaks will make some people very unhappy, such as mutopia.
> >
> > This also serves as test of developers: we've avoided getting
> > "pinned down" with the input syntax because that would limit
> > development. How do you two feel about your hard work on the \cr
> > stuff being delayed by up to a year? I don't like asking this,
> > but I think there are solid reasons for it.
>
> This would be a pity. I've now forgotten the
> details of the cr changes, but cannot a way be
> found to introduce the new versions now while
> retaining the deprecated versions until 3.0?
> Even a partial introduction now would help users.
New patch, just for the backend:
http://codereview.appspot.com/109072
The definition of \cresc etc. is still unchanged, but one can now define one's
own command instead (or overwrite the definition of \cresc).
Cheers,
Reinhold
- --
- ------------------------------------------------------------------
Reinhold Kainhofer, address@hidden, http://reinhold.kainhofer.com/
* Financial & Actuarial Math., Vienna Univ. of Technology, Austria
* http://www.fam.tuwien.ac.at/, DVR: 0005886
* LilyPond, Music typesetting, http://www.lilypond.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFKjy5STqjEwhXvPN0RAuctAJ4sCgw2JuB1jDcFMkWXLQC2WbzMoACfbTb9
YllPxoJxkaelcczQPDeLiek=
=646x
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----