[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Licensing dependencies

From: Joseph Wakeling
Subject: Re: Licensing dependencies
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 19:41:55 +0200
User-agent: Thunderbird (X11/20090817)

Graham Percival wrote:
> What does this mean?  I mean, *any* project would be a problem if
> they changed to a non-GPLv2-compatible license.  Are they
> considering/planning such a change?

Not that I know of.  The point is just that most Lilypond dependencies
are either called rather than linked to, or have permissive licenses --
(L)GPL'd dependencies like Pango have greater potential for a version
upgrade that buggers GPLv2-only code.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]