[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: copyright info... actually wanted!
From: |
Joseph Wakeling |
Subject: |
Re: copyright info... actually wanted! |
Date: |
Sun, 27 Sep 2009 01:45:13 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) |
Graham Percival wrote:
> Please re-read my request. This is not what I asked for.
'As a separate patch, feel free to add the "this manual is under
the FDL" as a comment to the top of any relevant files in
Documentation/.'
I took 'all relevant files' to mean all files in the manual, re-reading
your request I now presume you mean just the top-level file for each
manual ... ?
Is there any particular reason why these per-file license statements are
bad?
Best wishes,
-- Joe