[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: neo-modern-voice?
From: |
Frédéric Bron |
Subject: |
Re: neo-modern-voice? |
Date: |
Tue, 20 Oct 2009 23:06:05 +0200 |
>>>> - the addition to scm/music-functions.scm uses standard indentation,
>>> Not quite. Compare your additions to the previous rule
>>> (neo-modern-cautionary).
>>
>> done
>
> It's still not right: the indentation level is too shallow. Are you
> using an editor which changes tabs to spaces?
>
> I've added a patch which shows how it should look.
This is because this file is a real mess mixing tabs and spaces! And
you do not display tabs as I do so the indentation looks different for
you and me. But as you said you did not bother having only spaces, I
used only spaces... Now here is the patch (I hope the last one) with
mixed tabs and spaces as it is for other styles. But I still think we
should chose between spaces and tabs, not mix both.
Thanks,
Frédéric
0001-added-new-automatic-accidental-behaviours-neo-moder.patch
Description: Binary data
- Re: neo-modern-voice?, Frédéric Bron, 2009/10/16
- Re: neo-modern-voice?, Neil Puttock, 2009/10/16
- Re: neo-modern-voice?, Frédéric Bron, 2009/10/16
- Re: neo-modern-voice?, Graham Percival, 2009/10/16
- Re: neo-modern-voice?, Neil Puttock, 2009/10/16
- Re: neo-modern-voice?, Graham Percival, 2009/10/16
- Re: neo-modern-voice?, Frédéric Bron, 2009/10/17
- Re: neo-modern-voice?, Frédéric Bron, 2009/10/17
- Re: neo-modern-voice?, Neil Puttock, 2009/10/17
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: neo-modern-voice?,
Frédéric Bron <=
- Re: neo-modern-voice?, Graham Percival, 2009/10/20
- Re: neo-modern-voice?, Neil Puttock, 2009/10/21
- Re: neo-modern-voice?, Neil Puttock, 2009/10/16