[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] serious doubts about waf
|
From: |
John Mandereau |
|
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] serious doubts about waf |
|
Date: |
Thu, 12 Nov 2009 10:21:16 +0100 |
Le jeudi 12 novembre 2009 à 00:21 +0100, John Mandereau a écrit :
> Does the attached patch convince you to go on on Waf?
Actually, please ignore my patch and checkout a SVN copy of Waf instead
svn checkout http://waf.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/ && mv trunk waf
then invoke waf-light from this checkout.
Best,
John
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
[PATCH] Re: serious doubts about waf, John Mandereau, 2009/11/11
- Re: [PATCH] Re: serious doubts about waf, Graham Percival, 2009/11/11
- Re: [PATCH] serious doubts about waf,
John Mandereau <=
- Re: [PATCH] serious doubts about waf, Graham Percival, 2009/11/12
- Re: [PATCH] serious doubts about waf, Graham Percival, 2009/11/14
- Re: [PATCH] serious doubts about waf, John Mandereau, 2009/11/24
- Re: [PATCH] serious doubts about waf, Graham Percival, 2009/11/24
- Re: [PATCH] serious doubts about waf, John Mandereau, 2009/11/24
- Re: [PATCH] serious doubts about waf, Graham Percival, 2009/11/25