[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: developers developers developers
From: |
Francisco Vila |
Subject: |
Re: developers developers developers |
Date: |
Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:25:28 +0100 |
2009/11/12 Kieren MacMillan <address@hidden>:
> IM(NS)HO, the *only* reason to enthusiastically recommend
> Lilypond is its output: for 95+% of the population, it's an inferior
> engraving experience (i.e., high learning curve and no GUI), but the
> difference in output quality is so great that it justifies my fevered
> evangelism.
Human-readable input code is paramount. If that code is expressive
enough (as it is), both this and output together really make a
difference. IMO.
Why do you think 99% of MS Word users are aware of only 1% of its features?
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
www.paconet.org
www.csmbadajoz.com
- Re: developers developers developers, (continued)
- Re: developers developers developers, Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool), 2009/11/12
- Re: developers developers developers, demery, 2009/11/12
- Re: developers developers developers, Graham Percival, 2009/11/12
- Re: developers developers developers, Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool), 2009/11/12
- Re: developers developers developers, Graham Percival, 2009/11/12
- Re: developers developers developers, David Kastrup, 2009/11/13
- Re: developers developers developers, Kieren MacMillan, 2009/11/12
- Re: developers developers developers, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2009/11/12
- Re: developers developers developers,
Francisco Vila <=
- Re: developers developers developers, demery, 2009/11/12
Re: Quit [now definitely O/T], David Kastrup, 2009/11/12
Re: Quit [now definitely O/T], Chris Snyder, 2009/11/12