Re: Issue #768 - chord repetition shortcut: patch for review

[David Kastrup]

Marc Hohl <address@hidden> writes:

> David Kastrup schrieb:
>> [...]
>> But *4 is _logical_.  You can guess what it does without looking it up
>> in the manual.
>>   
> No. Since it looks like a multiplication, it treats the number, not
> the notes (at least for me). So < c e g>4*4 could be interpreted as
> < c e g >16, which is not what we want.

So you think one should prohibit R1*8 since people might confuse it with
R8?

I don't buy that argument.

-- 
David Kastrup