Re: 2.13.9 out

[Graham Percival]

On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 01:35:24PM -0800, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 6:24 AM, Graham Percival
> <address@hidden> wrote:
> >
> > Quick poll: I promised to announce 2.13.9 on the info list (after
> > waiting 12-24 hours for tests to avoid any huge embarassment), but
> > it seems that the website still only displays 2.13.7.  Who thinks
> > I should announce 2.13.9 with the website in the current state
> > (i.e. telling people to look for the download site link under
> > ancient versions), and who thinks I should wait until the website
> > is fixed?
> 
> Do we know what's wrong with the website?  Is this something I can help fix?

No, I don't know yet.  You can help by taking care of Valentin's
CSS patch, since I always prioritize dealing with patches over my
own new work.  I'll deal with James Lowe's recent contribution,
then start looking at the website.

Cheers,
- Graham