[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [frogs] Patch for Issue #830
From: |
Neil Puttock |
Subject: |
Re: [frogs] Patch for Issue #830 |
Date: |
Sun, 20 Dec 2009 18:14:46 +0000 |
2009/12/20 Carl Sorensen <address@hidden>:
> I think I'd like to recommend that in the future, instead of emailing
> patches (with the associated problems with line endings), we just have Frogs
> post them on Rietveld.
I'd also recommend at least checking a snippet runs properly (if not
doing a regression test check); an error-free run of make all
certainly isn't enough for such an invasive patch.
warning: time signature symbol `C44' not found; reverting to numbered style
Regards,
Neil
- Re: [frogs] Patch for Issue #830, Carl Sorensen, 2009/12/20
- Re: [frogs] Patch for Issue #830,
Neil Puttock <=
- Re: [frogs] Patch for Issue #830, Marc Hohl, 2009/12/20
- Re: [frogs] Patch for Issue #830, Mark Polesky, 2009/12/20
- Re: [frogs] Patch for Issue #830, Marc Hohl, 2009/12/20
- Message not available
- Re: [frogs] Patch for Issue #830, Graham Percival, 2009/12/20
- Re: [frogs] Patch for Issue #830, Marc Hohl, 2009/12/20
- Re: [frogs] Patch for Issue #830, Graham Percival, 2009/12/21
- Re: [frogs] Patch for Issue #830, Mark Polesky, 2009/12/21
- Re: [frogs] Patch for Issue #830, Graham Percival, 2009/12/21
- Re: [frogs] Patch for Issue #830, Trevor Daniels, 2009/12/20
- Re: [frogs] Patch for Issue #830, Graham Percival, 2009/12/20