[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
StaffGrouper vs. VerticalAxisGroup: syntax inconsistencies
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
StaffGrouper vs. VerticalAxisGroup: syntax inconsistencies |
Date: |
Wed, 30 Dec 2009 06:35:47 +0100 (CET) |
Folks,
why can I say
\new PianoStaff \with {
\override StaffGrouper
#'between-staff-spacing #'minimum-distance = #20
} ...
but not
\new Staff \with {
\override VerticalAxisGroup
#'next-staff-spacing #'minimum-distance = #20
} ...
?
The latter gives this warning:
warning: type check for `next-staff-spacing' failed;
value `((minimum-distance . 12) .
#<primitive-procedure
ly:axis-group-interface::calc-next-staff-spacing>)'
must be of type `list'
I would like to use former syntax form for the latter too, and it
seems to be a real syntax inconsistency since both the
`between-staff-spacing' and `next-staff-spacing' lists contain the
same elements.
Werner
- StaffGrouper vs. VerticalAxisGroup: syntax inconsistencies,
Werner LEMBERG <=