[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: new smaller installers to test
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: new smaller installers to test |
Date: |
Fri, 19 Feb 2010 04:51:04 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 11:25:33PM -0200, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Graham Percival
> <address@hidden> wrote:
> > woah, this is weird. The 2.13.12 regtest comparison shows them just fine:
>
> The regtest comparison uses the bounding boxes inside lilypond.
> Errors in ghostscript dont generate differences inside lilypond, so
> they are not registered in lilypond.
Good to know! I'll add a note to the CG.
> > Anybody have suggestions? I could simply revert the change, but it
> > seemed that people liked the idea of saving some space. Does anybody
> > know ghostscript and want to suggest which of these dirs I should try
> > keeping?
> > + 'share/ghostscript/*/Resource/{CMap,ColorSpace,Decoding}/',
> > + 'share/ghostscript/*/Resource/{Encoding,Font,SubstCID}/',
>
> The largest ones are the Encoding files, which are related to
> international fonts, so if this is the cause of the problem (I think
> it is).
ok, I'll test that when I get to university in a few hours.
> You could also run the GS command by hand with -dQUIET switched off,
> to see if it complains of missing Resource files.
Patrick says it complains, but it did this before the extra
stripping.
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2010-02/msg00140.html
(I'm not certain if GenericResourceDir is the warning you mean,
though)
Cheers,
- Graham
- Re: new smaller installers to test, (continued)
Re: new smaller installers to test, Trevor Daniels, 2010/02/12
Re: new smaller installers to test, Patrick McCarty, 2010/02/12
Re: new smaller installers to test, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2010/02/17
- Re: new smaller installers to test, Graham Percival, 2010/02/18
- Re: new smaller installers to test, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2010/02/18
- Re: new smaller installers to test,
Graham Percival <=
- Re: new smaller installers to test, Graham Percival, 2010/02/19
- Re: new smaller installers to test, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2010/02/19
- Re: new smaller installers to test, Patrick McCarty, 2010/02/19
- Re: new smaller installers to test, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2010/02/19