Re: Problem in docs: ref in included/

[Trevor Daniels]

Graham Percival wrote Tuesday, March 02, 2010 9:30 AM


> On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 09:25:55AM -0000, Trevor Daniels wrote:
> > Following Francisco's "correction" my local check
> > on reference validity now says
> >
> > > Warning: xref should be internal around line  231  in  
> > > included/compile.itexi
> > > Warning: xref should be internal around line  761  in  
> > > included/compile.itexi
> >
> > so I think these two should be set back to straight @refs.
>
> We'll need to update that checker to ignore such cases.  

This is only my own personal checker, not a LP
one.  I'll see if it's doable, though.

> Either that, or we'll need to play games with
> @ifset topdoc
> to give those a @rcontrib, but otherwise use @ref.

Nah, not worth it.

> The problem is that when compiling contributor.texi, texinfo
> prefers (but does not require) a @ref.  But when compiling
> INSTALL.txt, texinfo requires a @rcontrib.

Ah, right, now I understand.  I guess I've not been 
following this development of double includes closely 
enough.

Sorry Francisco, you were right all along.

Trevor