Re: Unicode cuteness

[Trevor Daniels]

Carl Sorensen wrote Monday, March 15, 2010 6:35 PM


> On 3/15/10 11:23 AM, "David Kastrup" <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > For selfdescribing glyphs, is the following somewhat defensive 
> > approach
> > sensible, or should 𝄞 be equivalent to the whole \clef "G" 
> > sequence?
> >
> > If the latter, it would need modifying the parser, right?  That 
> > would
> > have the advantage that note lengths like 𝅘𝅥𝅰 could also be 
> > employed,
> > pitches written like B𝄫, rests including length as 𝄽, and other
> > niceties.
>
> I'm not a big fan of moving in this direction; your emails with 
> unicode
> included don't render properly on my email client.

Nor mine.  So I can't even understand the point you are trying
to make.

Trevor