[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Unicode cuteness
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Unicode cuteness |
Date: |
Tue, 16 Mar 2010 18:02:38 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.92 (gnu/linux) |
Mark Polesky <address@hidden> writes:
> Carl Sorensen wrote:
>> I'm OK with that, but I still have the concern of
>> documenting it. What do we need to do to make sure that
>> the documentation works properly?
>
> I don't think it's worth it. There are too many
> documentation issues. I made a tiny change to
> tutorial.itely as a test; I just put a couple of these
> characters in @samp block. The characters display nicely in
> html, but here are some problems I've found:
>
> 1) the characters don't display at all in pdf.
> 2) only half of the characters display in info.
> 3) gitk renders the commit with some weird escape sequences.
>
> Not sure if the gitk issue translates to any real problem,
> but the first two are obvious non-starters. I've attached
> some images to demonstrate.
We will get into trouble with documenting Hebrew lyrics and other things
at one time then, I guess.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: Unicode cuteness, (continued)
- Re: Unicode cuteness, Werner LEMBERG, 2010/03/15
- Re: Unicode cuteness, Carl Sorensen, 2010/03/15
- Re: Unicode cuteness, Werner LEMBERG, 2010/03/15
- Re: Unicode cuteness, Valentin Villenave, 2010/03/15
- Re: Unicode cuteness, John Mandereau, 2010/03/15
- Re: Unicode cuteness, David Kastrup, 2010/03/16
- Re: Unicode cuteness, Reinhold Kainhofer, 2010/03/16
Re: Unicode cuteness, Mark Polesky, 2010/03/16