Re: 2.13.18 might not contain everything

[Graham Percival]

On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 02:27:09PM +0200, Francisco Vila wrote:
> 2010/4/16 Graham Percival <address@hidden>:
> > My git history looks a bit weird (I think I forgot to push at the
> > right time), and a quick check indicates that the fix to 1027 (a doc
> > fix added a few days ago) wasn't included.
> 
> I rebased (instead of pulling) and now we have some repeated commits
> in lilypond/translation.

I'm not concerned about the release (any missing bugfixes will be
in .19 anyway), but does this matter for the commit history?  I
mean, we had a week of git not-really-working while Jan made
multiple different versions of the repository; would something
like that be required in the future?

Or does it only affect lilypond/translation, which we don't look
at the stats for?

Cheers,
- Graham