[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Don't hardcode a limited set of markup signatures. (issue969046)
From: |
Han-Wen Nienhuys |
Subject: |
Re: Don't hardcode a limited set of markup signatures. (issue969046) |
Date: |
Mon, 3 May 2010 08:01:27 -0300 |
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 4:22 AM, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>> For one reason or another, whenever I review code from you it degrades
>>>> into a fight. I am not quite sure why this always happens.
>>>
>>> Because you don't bother taking the contributions of other people
>>> seriously. You don't read the code comments, even after you asked for
>>
>> Thanks for explaining this; it's obviously my fault. I'll go back to
>> where I came from.
>
> Nice touch, but it's not your work going in the bin.
Just for the record: I am ok with the current form of the patch.
I take issue with the way you interact with me on the mailing-list,
and I have had enough of it.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - address@hidden - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
- Don't hardcode a limited set of markup signatures. (issue969046), hanwenn, 2010/05/01
- Re: Don't hardcode a limited set of markup signatures. (issue969046), dak, 2010/05/01
- Re: Don't hardcode a limited set of markup signatures. (issue969046), hanwenn, 2010/05/01
- Re: Don't hardcode a limited set of markup signatures. (issue969046), dak, 2010/05/02
- Re: Don't hardcode a limited set of markup signatures. (issue969046), Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2010/05/02
- Re: Don't hardcode a limited set of markup signatures. (issue969046), David Kastrup, 2010/05/02
- Re: Don't hardcode a limited set of markup signatures. (issue969046), Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2010/05/02
- Re: Don't hardcode a limited set of markup signatures. (issue969046), David Kastrup, 2010/05/02
- Re: Don't hardcode a limited set of markup signatures. (issue969046), Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2010/05/02
- Re: Don't hardcode a limited set of markup signatures. (issue969046), David Kastrup, 2010/05/03
- Re: Don't hardcode a limited set of markup signatures. (issue969046),
Han-Wen Nienhuys <=
- Re: Don't hardcode a limited set of markup signatures. (issue969046), Kieren MacMillan, 2010/05/03
- Ousting bad people (was: Don't hardcode a limited set of markup signatures. (issue969046)), David Kastrup, 2010/05/03
- Re: Ousting bad people (was: Don't hardcode a limited set of markup signatures. (issue969046)), Kieren MacMillan, 2010/05/03
- Re: Ousting bad people, David Kastrup, 2010/05/03
- Re: Ousting bad people, Werner LEMBERG, 2010/05/03
- our development mess, Graham Percival, 2010/05/03
- Re: Ousting bad people, David Kastrup, 2010/05/03
- Re: Don't hardcode a limited set of markup signatures. (issue969046), Carl Sorensen, 2010/05/03
- Re: Don't hardcode a limited set of markup signatures. (issue969046), David Kastrup, 2010/05/19
- Re: Don't hardcode a limited set of markup signatures. (issue969046), David Kastrup, 2010/05/02