[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] Doc: LM: Reformat ly code.

From: Mark Polesky
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Doc: LM: Reformat ly code.
Date: Mon, 3 May 2010 21:34:21 -0700 (PDT)

Trevor Daniels wrote:
>> I think we should always use bar-checks when the piece
>> is more than one bar long.  That's a good habit to get
>> into; we ought to start it right from the first.
> I would agree with this.  In fact I put bar checks into
> quite a few of the examples in the LM originally, but they
> seem to have been removed.

Perhaps the reason for removing the bar checks was that
they're not explained at all in the LM.  Do you think we
should mention bar checks (briefly) near the beginning of
the LM, without going into detail?  Then we'd be justified
using them in the examples.

- Mark


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]