Re: [PATCH] Doc: LM: Reformat ly code.

[Graham Percival]

On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 10:19:52AM -0700, Mark Polesky wrote:
> Trevor Daniels wrote:
> > A brief description of bar checks in 1.2.2 Working on
> > input files would be good.  I think bar checks are at
> > least as important as a \version statement, which is
> > mentioned there.
> 
> I think a better place would be in a new @subsection at the
> top of 2.1 "Single staff notation", just before 2.1.1
> "Accidentals and key signatures".  Here's my proposed text:

Eh?!  You think this is more important than accidentals, ties, and
articulation?  To me, this looks like prime 2.4 Final touches
material.

If we need it for 2.3 Songs... which I suppose we should do...
then I'd put it as either the last item inside 2.1.6 Advanced
rhythmic commands, or as a new 2.1.7.

Cheers,
- Graham