[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] Doc: LM: Reformat ly code.

From: Trevor Daniels
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Doc: LM: Reformat ly code.
Date: Wed, 5 May 2010 17:37:42 +0100

Graham Percival wrote Wednesday, May 05, 2010 3:51 PM
On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 10:19:52AM -0700, Mark Polesky wrote:
Trevor Daniels wrote:
> A brief description of bar checks in 1.2.2 Working on
> input files would be good.  I think bar checks are at
> least as important as a \version statement, which is
> mentioned there.

I think a better place would be in a new @subsection at the
top of 2.1 "Single staff notation", just before 2.1.1
"Accidentals and key signatures".  Here's my proposed text:

Eh?!  You think this is more important than accidentals, ties, and
articulation?  To me, this looks like prime 2.4 Final touches

It's nothing to do with being more important; it's so
bar checks can be used in those examples.

If we need it for 2.3 Songs... which I suppose we should do...
then I'd put it as either the last item inside 2.1.6 Advanced
rhythmic commands,

That would be rather silly ...

or as a new 2.1.7.

I suppose this would do, as long as the previous examples
didn't include bar checks.

But I still prefer my original suggestion - in 1.2 How to write
input files - where all the other hints and conventions are


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]